Objection
Your framework justifies Social Darwinism by baptizing evolutionary success as 'moral.'
This is a synchronic misreading. It mistakes a temporary snapshot of Neikos (strife) for a stable state. NPN morality is assessed diachronically (across time). A society based on pure brutality is unstable and invites collective defense (Philia), leading to systemic collapse. True moral strength is the resilient balance of Philia and Neikos that ensures long-term stability, not momentary dominance.
Note: For the full formal objection and detailed rebuttal, see Appendix J: Objections & Rebuttals.